Well... The polling is over, and the fate of all candidates in the Nanoor constituency is sealed in the EVM.So far, 93.46% voting has been recorded in the Nanoor constituency. The Nanoor constituency which is a key constituency , is known for its diverse electorate and crucial role in West Bengal ’s governance. The Nanoor election result holds significant importance as it often witnesses intense battles between major political parties, shaping the city`s political landscape.In the race for the new assembly from this constituency, Shymali Pradhan of the CPM, Khokan Das of the BJP, and Abhay Das of Congress are in the fray.
In the last assembly election held in 2026 in West Bengal, Bidhan Chandra Majhi of the All India Trinamool Congress won the seat by defeating Khokan Das of the Bharatiya Janata Party with a margin of 8122 votes. Stay updated with the latest news, candidate profiles, and insights from this influential seat.
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Bidhan Chandra Majhi
Winner
|
All India Trinamool Congress |
119,910
Lead:
8,122
|
47.37% |
| Khokan Das | Bharatiya Janata Party | 111,788 | 44.16% |
| Shymali Pradhan | Communist Party of India (Marxist) | 10,589 | 4.18% |
| Abhay Das | Indian National Congress | 3,040 | 1.20% |
| Chiran Das | Aam Janata Unnayan party | 2,994 | 1.18% |
| Nota | None Of The Above | 1,865 | 0.74% |
| Ram Prasad Thandar | Bahujan Samaj Party | 1,673 | 0.66% |
| Joyshri Hazra | Independent | 1,260 | 0.50% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Bidhan Chandra Majhi
Winner
|
All India Trinamool Congress |
112,116
Lead:
6,670
|
48% |
| Tarak Saha | Bharatiya Janata Party | 105,446 | 45% |
| Shyamali Pradhan | Communist Party of India (Marxist) | 12,878 | 5% |
| Chandipada Das | Bahujan Samaj Party | 2,739 | 1% |
| Nota | None Of The Above | 2,149 | 1% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Shyamali Pradhan
Winner
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
104,374
Lead:
25,730
|
50% |
| Gadadhar Hazra | All India Trinamool Congress | 78,644 | 38% |
| Tarakeswar Saha | Bharatiya Janata Party | 18,502 | 9% |
| None Of The Above | Nota | 4,342 | 2% |
| Sebashish Bagdi | Independent | 2,602 | 1% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Gadadhar Hazra
Winner
|
All India Trinamool Congress |
91,818
Lead:
5,863
|
49% |
| Shyamali Pradhan | Communist Party Of India (marxist) | 85,955 | 46% |
| Rajkumar Fulmali | Bharatiya Janata Party | 8,811 | 5% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Joydeb Hazra
Winner
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
72,713
Lead:
31,365
|
59% |
| Gadadhar Hazra | All India Trinamool Congress | 41,348 | 33% |
| Tapan Kumar Saha | Indian National Congress | 10,106 | 8% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Anand Gopal Das
Winner
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
65,520
Lead:
13,447
|
54% |
| Krishnagopal Majhi | All India Trinamool Congress | 52,073 | 43% |
| Tarun Das | Party For Democratic Socialism | 2,146 | 2% |
| Kartick Majhi | Independent | 1,446 | 1% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Anandagopal Das
Winner
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
62,252
Lead:
21,223
|
55% |
| Sibkinkar Saha | Indian National Congress | 41,029 | 36% |
| Jatadhari Dhibar | Bharatiya Janata Party | 6,398 | 6% |
| Simai Das | Independent | 196 | 0% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ananda Gopal Das
Winner
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
57,385
Lead:
32,285
|
56% |
| Sib Kinkar Saha | Indian National Congress | 25,100 | 24% |
| Soumendra Samajdar | Bharatiya Janata Party | 17,656 | 17% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Ananda Gopal Das
Winner
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
54,315
Lead:
22,912
|
62% |
| Adhir Kumar Saha | Indian National Congress | 31,403 | 36% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Banamali Das
Winner
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
45,052
Lead:
9,347
|
55% |
| Sib Kinkar Saha | Indian National Congress | 35,705 | 43% |
| Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Banamali Das
Winner
|
Communist Party Of India (marxist) |
27,107
Lead:
19,114
|
62% |
| Dulal Saha | Indian National Congress | 7,993 | 18% |
| Kebal Ram Hazra | Janta Party | 7,657 | 17% |
| Sristidhar Jash | Independent | 240 | 1% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Lead | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Bidhan Chandra Majhi | AITC | 119,910 | 8,122 | 47.37% |
| 2021 | Bidhan Chandra Majhi | AITC | 112,116 | 6,670 | 48% |
| 2016 | Shyamali Pradhan | CPM | 104,374 | 25,730 | 50% |
| 2011 | Gadadhar Hazra | AITC | 91,818 | 5,863 | 49% |
| 2006 | Joydeb Hazra | CPI(M) | 72,713 | 31,365 | 59% |
| 2001 | Anand Gopal Das | CPM | 65,520 | 13,447 | 54% |
| 1996 | Anandagopal Das | CPM | 62,252 | 21,223 | 55% |
| 1991 | Ananda Gopal Das | CPM | 57,385 | 32,285 | 56% |
| 1987 | Ananda Gopal Das | CPM | 54,315 | 22,912 | 62% |
| 1982 | Banamali Das | CPM | 45,052 | 9,347 | 55% |
| 1977 | Banamali Das | CPM | 27,107 | 19,114 | 62% |
| Year | Candidate's Name | Party | Votes | Vote Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Bidhan Chandra Majhi | AITC |
119,910
(Lead:
8,122)
|
47.37% |
| Khokan Das | BJP | 111,788 | 44.16% | |
| 2021 | Bidhan Chandra Majhi | AITC |
112,116
(Lead:
6,670)
|
48% |
| Tarak Saha | BJP | 105,446 | 45% | |
| 2016 | Shyamali Pradhan | CPM |
104,374
(Lead:
25,730)
|
50% |
| Gadadhar Hazra | AITC | 78,644 | 38% | |
| 2011 | Gadadhar Hazra | AITC |
91,818
(Lead:
5,863)
|
49% |
| Shyamali Pradhan | CPM | 85,955 | 46% | |
| 2006 | Joydeb Hazra | CPI(M) |
72,713
(Lead:
31,365)
|
59% |
| Gadadhar Hazra | AITC | 41,348 | 33% | |
| 2001 | Anand Gopal Das | CPM |
65,520
(Lead:
13,447)
|
54% |
| Krishnagopal Majhi | AITC | 52,073 | 43% | |
| 1996 | Anandagopal Das | CPM |
62,252
(Lead:
21,223)
|
55% |
| Sibkinkar Saha | INC | 41,029 | 36% | |
| 1991 | Ananda Gopal Das | CPM |
57,385
(Lead:
32,285)
|
56% |
| Sib Kinkar Saha | INC | 25,100 | 24% | |
| 1987 | Ananda Gopal Das | CPM |
54,315
(Lead:
22,912)
|
62% |
| Adhir Kumar Saha | INC | 31,403 | 36% | |
| 1982 | Banamali Das | CPM |
45,052
(Lead:
9,347)
|
55% |
| Sib Kinkar Saha | INC | 35,705 | 43% | |
| 1977 | Banamali Das | CPM |
27,107
(Lead:
19,114)
|
62% |
| Dulal Saha | INC | 7,993 | 18% |
All 294 Assembly Constituencies in West Bengal
Bidhan Chandra Majhi of the All India Trinamool Congress (AITC) won the Nanoor Assembly seat in the 2026 elections, defeating Khokan Das of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) by a margin of 8122 votes.
The strike rate in the Nanoor constituency is 70% CPM and 30% AITC, with CPM won 7 times and AITC won 3 times since the 1977 elections.
Bidhan Chandra Majhi (AITC) received 47.37% vote share.
Khokan Das (BJP) received 44.16% vote share.
Bidhan Chandra Majhi (AITC) won the 2026 election with 119910 votes, leading by 8122 votes and securing a 47.37% vote share.
Bidhan Chandra Majhi (AITC) won the Nanoor Assembly seat in 2026 with a margin of 8122 votes over Khokan Das (BJP).
The top candidates in the Nanoor Assembly Election 2026 were:
Bidhan Chandra Majhi (AITC)
Khokan Das (BJP)
Shymali Pradhan (CPM)
These candidates were the main contenders for the seat, with Bidhan Chandra Majhi (AITC) emerging as the winner.
The voter turnout in the Nanoor Assembly Election 2026 was 93.46%
This page contains historical election results sourced from the Election Commission of India (ECI). It is for archival and informational purposes only and does not represent current or ongoing election updates. The information provided on this page about the current and previous elections in the constituency is sourced from various publicly available platforms including https://old.eci.gov.in/statistical-report/statistical-reports/ and https://affidavit.eci.gov.in/. The ECI is the authoritative source for election-related data in India, and we rely on their official records for the content presented here. However, due to the complexity of electoral processes and potential data discrepancies, there may be occasional inaccuracies or omissions in the information provided.