Salman Khan's interim plea rejected in defamation case; court tells 'evidence justifies allegations'
New Delhi, Mar 31: Salman Khan's plea seeking an interim order in a defamation suit against his NRI neighbour Ketan Kakkar has been rejected by the Mumbai sessions court on Thursday.
Sessions Court Judge AH Laddhad, who pronounced the order on March 23, rejected his plea stating that Kakkar had placed on record evidence like complaints and show-cause notices to Salman about the allegations of encroachments by the actor in his Panvel property, the 100-acres Farm, in the public interest as a "whistle-blower".

The detailed order came out on Wednesday.
The Bollywood superstar filed a civil suit alleging that Ketan Kakkad defamed him during an interview with a YouTube channel.
Khan, who lives in suburban Bandra in Mumbai, owns a farmhouse in Panvel in neighbouring Raigad district. Kakkad, also a Mumbai resident, owns a plot on a hill next to Khan's farmhouse.
According to Khan's suit, Kakkad made slanderous comments against the actor while speaking to a YouTuber. Two other people who participated in the show have also been named as respondents.
The Bollywood superstar has also made YouTube, social media sites such as Facebook, Twitter and search engine giant Google parties to the suit, demanding that they be directed to block and remove the defamatory content' from their websites. Khan wants a permanent order restraining Kakkad from posting or publishing defamatory content about the actor or his farmhouse.
Speaking with news agency ANI, Ketan Kakkar's Advocate Aditya Pratap Singh said that his client is an NRI and had purchased a piece of land in Panvel near Salman Khan's farmhouse.
"He (Salman) tried to snatch that land by several means using his contacts in police and officials etc. When my client tried to put his views about the factual position of the case Salman Khan approached Mumbai City Civil and Sessions court seeking an injunction against my client but the court has rejected his application and has prima facie held that whatever allegations my client has made against him are based on evidence," Singh said.
Kakkar had uploaded videos on social media sites and YouTube in which he claimed about purchasing the land in 1995 for constructing a house, ashram and temple. It was cancelled by the Forest Department following his dispute with Salman Khan.
In the videos, Kakkar stated that he had constructed an eco-friendly Ganesh temple but it was grabbed by Khan's family.
-
Gold Silver Rate Today, 30 March 2026: City-Wise Prices, MCX Update On 24K Gold, 22K Gold And Silver -
LPG Crunch: Karnataka Brings New SOPs, Makes PNG Registration Mandatory for Businesses -
Hyderabad Gold Silver Rate Today, 30 March 2026: Check Fresh 24K, 22K, 18K Gold And Silver Prices In City -
Opinion Poll For Kerala Assembly Election 2026: Ldf Strength In Kannur And Kasaragod -
Tamil Nadu Polls 2026: Vijay Reveals Rs 645 Crore Assets, Rs 266 Crore in Banks; Know All His Declaration -
Mumbai Metro Line 9 Set for April 3 Launch, Dahisar-Mira Bhayandar to Get Direct Boost -
Hyderabad Gold Silver Rate Today, 31 March 2026: Gold And Silver See Fresh Movement, Check Latest City Rates -
Gold Silver Rate Today, 31 March 2026: City-Wise Prices, MCX Trend As Gold Rises And Silver Slips -
Rahul Arunoday Banerjee Autopsy Report: Actor Was Underwater For Over An Hour, Sand Found In Lungs -
Thunderstorm Warning In Delhi NCR: IMD Issues Orange Alert Amid Sudden Weather Shift -
Trump Hints At Breakthrough With Iran Amid War Escalation, Calls Recent Move A ‘Sign Of Respect’ -
UP STF Nabs Maulana Abdullah Salim Over Controversial Comment On CM Yogi's Mother












Click it and Unblock the Notifications